The term Conquest’s Law was coined by Robert Conquest, a British historian and Sovietologist, in the 1970s. It is a satirical law, meant to be humorous, which states that “Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.“
Conquest’s Law is based on his observations of the political left’s tendency to move towards more radical and extreme positions over time. He argued that this is because the left is motivated by a desire for social change, and that as they achieve more change, they become more dissatisfied and demand even more.
Some Examples
- Conquest’s Law in action can be seen in the history of the Labour Party in the United Kingdom. The Labour Party was founded in 1900 as a moderate socialist party. However, over time, the party has moved to the left, and today it is considered to be a center-left party. This shift to the left has been driven by a number of factors, including the party’s desire to appeal to a wider range of voters and its commitment to social justice.
- The Democratic Party in the United States has moved to the left over the past few decades. In the 1970s, the party was considered to be a center-right party. However, today it is considered to be a center-left party. This shift to the left has been driven by a number of factors, including the party’s desire to appeal to a wider range of voters and its commitment to social justice.
- The European Union has also moved to the left over the past few decades. The EU was founded in 1957 as a free trade zone. However, over time, the EU has become more involved in social policy, and today it is considered to be a left-wing organization. This shift to the left has been driven by a number of factors, including the EU’s desire to promote social justice and its commitment to environmental protection.
Implications to Public Discourse
- One example is the use of Conquest’s Law by conservative commentator Ben Shapiro. Shapiro has used the law to argue that the left is becoming increasingly radical and that this is a threat to democracy. He has also used the law to criticize the Democratic Party, arguing that the party is moving too far to the left.
- Another example is the use of the law by right-wing media outlets. These outlets have used the law to attack the left, arguing that the left is becoming increasingly intolerant and that this is a threat to free speech. They have also used the law to criticize the Democratic Party, arguing that the party is moving too far to the left.
- The use of Conquest’s Law in public discourse has had some meaningful implications. Some may argue that it has contributed to shape the way that people think about the left and the Democratic Party, which in some way have contributed to fuel what seems to be an increasing partisan divide in the United States. This divide can be viewed as harmful to democracy, as it can lead to a climate of intolerance and fear.
Summary
It is important to note that Conquest’s Law is not a hard and fast rule, it is a generalization, and is naturally not without its critics. Some argue that it is simplistic and inaccurate, and there are many examples of organizations that have not become left-wing, and there are many organizations that have moved to the right. However, Conquest’s Law does provide a useful framework for understanding the nature of political change.
It can also be seen as a warning about the dangers of political extremism. When people become too attached to their own ideology, they can become blind to the flaws in that ideology. This can lead to disastrous consequences. Conquest’s law is a thought-provoking observation about human nature. It is a reminder that we should all be careful about becoming too attached to our own beliefs.
Leave a Reply